Search
Latest topics
» So. California & Inland Valleys -March / April Planting Guideby sanderson Yesterday at 4:45 pm
» April: What to plant in No. California/Central Valley area
by sanderson Yesterday at 4:41 pm
» Think Spring 2023
by sanderson Yesterday at 4:36 pm
» SFG in the 916? First Time MM "Build"...
by Irrig8The916 Yesterday at 11:03 am
» Planting Seed Potatoes vs Store bought potatoes.
by markqz 3/29/2023, 11:49 pm
» Attracting Beneficial Insects Such As The Aphidius Wasp
by dstack 3/29/2023, 6:17 pm
» Happy Birthday!!
by AtlantaMarie 3/29/2023, 6:51 am
» Bunk Feeder for Bed
by Lizlo_FL 3/28/2023, 6:27 pm
» Weird spots on tomato leaves seedlings
by Mattlund 3/28/2023, 4:56 pm
» soil block makers
by OhioGardener 3/28/2023, 1:27 pm
» Greenhouse - Helpful Hints in Setting up a Wood-Framed Greenhouse
by sunflowersarefun 3/28/2023, 1:13 pm
» Sourdough Starter
by Scorpio Rising 3/28/2023, 9:03 am
» Hurricane
by yolos 3/27/2023, 10:27 pm
» Winter Lag - Waiting for Sprimg
by WhiteWolf22 3/27/2023, 12:39 am
» N&C Midwest: March & April 2023
by OhioGardener 3/26/2023, 3:48 pm
» Kiwi's SFG Adventure
by sanderson 3/25/2023, 10:11 pm
» Mixing Mel's Mix
by sanderson 3/25/2023, 4:08 pm
» Hi from Northern VA!
by onebirdiema 3/25/2023, 4:06 pm
» Sifted Peat
by sanderson 3/25/2023, 3:40 pm
» Can I Use this As My 5 Sources of Compost?
by sanderson 3/25/2023, 3:36 pm
» Green onions
by OhioGardener 3/25/2023, 8:28 am
» Nero Di Toscana Cabbage or Black Palm Tree
by Paul Crowe 3/25/2023, 6:01 am
» Chinese Cabbage and Radicchio, spacing?
by Paul Crowe 3/25/2023, 5:40 am
» finished my SGF garden
by sanderson 3/25/2023, 3:49 am
» need specific advice on MM
by sanderson 3/25/2023, 3:42 am
» Compost from Five Different Sources
by sanderson 3/25/2023, 3:32 am
» Indoor seed starting question
by Simso 3/24/2023, 8:30 pm
» Senseless Banter...
by OhioGardener 3/22/2023, 8:11 pm
» After harvest, leave the roots in or remove
by Mikesgardn 3/22/2023, 7:53 pm
» Best choice of pot to plant my seedling
by markqz 3/22/2023, 1:30 pm
Google
A suggestion for the non-Flash support problem
+2
choksaw
daisyhill
6 posters
Page 1 of 1
A suggestion for the non-Flash support problem
I would have preferred to add this to the original thread, but it's locked so I can't!
I've got a suggestion as a workaround for the problem with the main site blocking users who don't have the latest version of Flash, or don't have it at all. As I've seen, there is a page that says, "You don't have Flash, you must upgrade," or words to that effect. Could you add a link to the forum index page at the bottom of that warning page? The forums do work (for me, at least) and it would mean people could still access useful information rather than being turned away at the front door as they are right now.
What do you think, is this change feasible?
I've got a suggestion as a workaround for the problem with the main site blocking users who don't have the latest version of Flash, or don't have it at all. As I've seen, there is a page that says, "You don't have Flash, you must upgrade," or words to that effect. Could you add a link to the forum index page at the bottom of that warning page? The forums do work (for me, at least) and it would mean people could still access useful information rather than being turned away at the front door as they are right now.
What do you think, is this change feasible?
daisyhill-
Posts : 25
Join date : 2010-04-03
Location : New Zealand
Re: A suggestion for the non-Flash support problem
A link to the adobe website where people can get the flash upgrade?
choksaw-
Posts : 459
Join date : 2010-03-02
Age : 48
Location : New Port Richey FL.
Re: A suggestion for the non-Flash support problem
I believe she means a link directly to the Forum.
As in https://squarefoot.forumotion.com/
This would allow people access to information via the forum instead of being denied anything (as they are now if they don't have a browser that supports flash).
As in https://squarefoot.forumotion.com/
This would allow people access to information via the forum instead of being denied anything (as they are now if they don't have a browser that supports flash).
Re: A suggestion for the non-Flash support problem
LOL I thought they were talking about having two different links on the bottom of the page for two different reasons! This talking without using my hands is HARD!
Re: A suggestion for the non-Flash support problem
daisyhill wrote:I would have preferred to add this to the original thread, but it's locked so I can't!
I've got a suggestion as a workaround for the problem with the main site blocking users who don't have the latest version of Flash, or don't have it at all. As I've seen, there is a page that says, "You don't have Flash, you must upgrade," or words to that effect. Could you add a link to the forum index page at the bottom of that warning page? The forums do work (for me, at least) and it would mean people could still access useful information rather than being turned away at the front door as they are right now.
What do you think, is this change feasible?
This is a great idea. I am not sure as to how to implement this as that message comes from Adobe, but I will look into it. Thanks!

SFGHQSTAFF- administrator
-
Posts : 264
Join date : 2010-02-26
Re: A suggestion for the non-Flash support problem
I took another look at the page (http://www.squarefootgardening.com/noflashhtml) - looks like it's created by whoever your web provider is (wix.com?) so you might not be able to access it from whatever the normal editor is. However you may well be able to add the link if you can access that page via FTP and edit it directly. I'm sure they have come up against this problem before, and there's bound to be a workaround if you can just find the right file to change! 

daisyhill-
Posts : 25
Join date : 2010-04-03
Location : New Zealand
Shocked by new website
I was rather shocked this morning when I visited the SFG website to learn that the standards-compliant website had been ditched for a Flash site. I can't fathom why this decision was made, as it makes the site inaccessible to so many users. Aside from the iPhone and iPad not being able to view the site (and thanks to Apple's new developer agreement, never will be able to), it is also inaccessible to people using screen readers and other assistive technologies. I am not a lawyer, but it seems that Flash-only sites in general do not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act 1990.
It also breaks the following:
The ability for search engines to index the site (you'll want this fixed if you want more visitors!)
Browser navigation features: bookmarks, search, tabs, etc
Now for some constructive criticism, as I'm aware a lot of time was spent on the new site.
1. Add the ability to search the site. Information is too hard to find otherwise. (not sure if this is even possible with the way the site is set up)
2. Make at least the main navigation bar HTML, so different sections can be opened in new tabs. (pet peeve of mine)
3. Port at least parts of the site to HTML so they're accessible again. It doesn't have to be done in one fell swoop, just start with the navigation bar, and work your way from there.
OR:
4. Have the old website accessible to those who can't use the new site.
The only time you should be using Flash is for things that are not possible with current web standards. These days, that basically means cartoons and games, and to a lesser extent video/audio.
Cheers,
David
It also breaks the following:
The ability for search engines to index the site (you'll want this fixed if you want more visitors!)
Browser navigation features: bookmarks, search, tabs, etc
Now for some constructive criticism, as I'm aware a lot of time was spent on the new site.
1. Add the ability to search the site. Information is too hard to find otherwise. (not sure if this is even possible with the way the site is set up)
2. Make at least the main navigation bar HTML, so different sections can be opened in new tabs. (pet peeve of mine)
3. Port at least parts of the site to HTML so they're accessible again. It doesn't have to be done in one fell swoop, just start with the navigation bar, and work your way from there.
OR:
4. Have the old website accessible to those who can't use the new site.
The only time you should be using Flash is for things that are not possible with current web standards. These days, that basically means cartoons and games, and to a lesser extent video/audio.
Cheers,
David
dmuir- Posts : 1
Join date : 2010-04-11
Re: A suggestion for the non-Flash support problem
Hello Everyone,
Thank you for your great suggestions. I am working on getting all the issues fixed. The site is now Searchable by the search engines(SEO) I have made each main section separate for bookmarks and such. I want to set up a standard HTML site as I do know the limitations of Flash(which I am finding ways to overcome!). All I ask is for your patience. Thanks. Alan
Thank you for your great suggestions. I am working on getting all the issues fixed. The site is now Searchable by the search engines(SEO) I have made each main section separate for bookmarks and such. I want to set up a standard HTML site as I do know the limitations of Flash(which I am finding ways to overcome!). All I ask is for your patience. Thanks. Alan
SFGHQSTAFF- administrator
-
Posts : 264
Join date : 2010-02-26
Re: A suggestion for the non-Flash support problem
The boss says he's workin' on it; that's good enough for me!
This thread is closed.
This thread is closed.

» Recent Forum Troubles: take a number
» Main website and Flash...
» Canning & Preserving 101
» WEBSITE suggestions: Layout, Design, Etc
» Another request for non-flash - Mobile site
» Main website and Flash...
» Canning & Preserving 101
» WEBSITE suggestions: Layout, Design, Etc
» Another request for non-flash - Mobile site
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|